StingCC/Shrink attached at the hip

[Judge Judy]

Desk Of Judge Judy

I just read on MW forum a piece that certainly says it all about Weitzner and Sting.

They both believe they are participating in a game. RX clearly admits Sting LIES in his web site articles and that it is "ok" because its all about money.

Is it "ok" to disregard the businesses and individuals who are put at risk when Sting writes untruths?

Why do posters like clevfan just come out and say "let it go"?

I will tell you. Because they blindly follow this person who continually is put into question and continually puts OTHERS at risk all for the almighty buck.

StingCC believes he is an 800lb gorilla. He is a spider monkey.
Regular trips abroad seem to calm the books but what is going to happen at some point will be the start of theeir demise.
RIO will certainly be at the tip of the RX tongue and if those guys think their friendship with RX is SOOOOO close that he won't talk then I suggest they look closely at the names already dropped. They were his good "friends" also.


THe Judge

[Blowfish]

I have met both individuals in question here and can say that they both seem to suffer from a low self-esteem problem that will make them tell anyone anything if they seem to like them.

They don't care about the truth or spreading information, good or bad, about the industry. They care about popularity. Hence the bragging about getting invited to posh caribbean islands and long stories of their nights out and dinners with all the head honchos.

If you're moving money for one of the big guys, why draw attention to yourself and your "employer" by bragging about it? Just do your job.

There have been many conversations between bookmakers that do advertise with the site about pulling their advertising. They do often fear to do so because it could lead to bashing or the release of damaging or untrue information.

What matters is the players that post. These forums are for EVERYONE. Whether you play the $1 lottery or bet $50,000 a game, it shouldn't matter, everyone should have a right to air their opinions.

Let those guys talk to themselves under their numerous ghosting names over there. To find the contradictions all one would have to do is use the search feature on their site--unless of couse it has been disabled or threads have been deleted to prevent themselves from being found out.

[stardust]

Were I the sportsbooks in question (advertisers) I would get a concentrated effort among the parties that agree the Rx is bad for business.

As they drop off the site and are libeled, each should file suit. This would have a two fold effect.

1.) The site would be deprived of revenue.
2.) The Rx would be spending $ in litigation on a growing # of suits.

At first they may be able to fend off the suits and pay the legal costs, but as the # of advertisers dwindled and the cost of litigation increased, he would soon reach the end of the bankroll.

Pretty soon, the lawsuits would make it impossible to run a web site. Imagine yourself up against 10 litigants with deep pockets and you with no revenue.

I believe this would be a very effective strategy and after a year or so - no more Rx. Even the domain name could be taken as part of a judgement against the corporation.