Tweet
Sites tipped to rake in $125 billion from punters are folding in droves, says Jamie Doward . They've been boycotted by credit card firms and now the big US players are set to raise the stakes
Sunday April 7, 2002
The Observer
It was billed as the new Eldorado, a surefire way of making money from the internet. Online casinos and gambling websites were predicted to earn huge sums for such places as Costa Rica and Bermuda by allowing billions of people hitherto deprived of gambling to bet wherever and whenever they wanted. 'The internet was global and as only 10 countries in the world have legalised bet ting shops, suddenly everyman and his dog thought "I'd like a bit of that",' said Nigel Payne, chief executive of Sportingbet.com which runs the largest online sports book in the world.
Thousands of sites based on sun-drenched islands where the authorities had scant interest in regulatory affairs sprang up seemingly overnight, attracting huge followings in Asia, the United States and the Middle East, where betting was banned.
After pornography, gambling quickly became the biggest online money spinner.
But many investors lured by the prospect of fantastic rewards, have played a high stakes game and lost in spectacular fashion. The promise of easy money has evaporated. 'It's very easy to set up an online casino, but it's increasingly difficult to make money out of it,' said Iain Wilkie, hospitality and leisure partner at consultant Ernst & Young.
Even established names have had their fingers burnt. The owner of Harrods, Mohamed al-Fayed, set up an online casino, Harrods.com. But the value of shares in Gaming Insight, the company that powers the site and in which Harrods Online holds a stake, has fallen from 25p last June to around 6p now, despite the company announcing that profits were up by 300 per cent to more than £12 million in the 18 months to 31 December last year.
Last week it was the turn of Damian Aspinall, son of the zookeeper and casinos magnate John Aspinall, to experience a reality check. His internet firm, the AIM-listed Aspinalls Online, admitted that a Bermuda-based online casino business it bought for more than £30m less than a year ago, was worthless.
In addition, the firm is to subcontract the management of its two online casinos to an outside operator. It all adds up to an ignominious fall from grace for one of the most famous names in casinos.
But these are grim times for most of the estimated 1,400 online gambling sites. Although the industry, which produced revenues of $4.6 billion last year, is predicted to be worth more than $125bn by 2015, it is undergoing massive turbulence.
'We're now seeing an industry fallout as the stronger players with the brands assert themselves. The smaller, opportunistic guys in places like Antigua or Costa Rica may have done well at first but most will be history,' Wilkie said.
Many have already had little choice but to close for good. US credit card firms and banks, worried about the rising levels of fraud, have taken to blocking transactions with the offshore firms, effectively cutting off their business.
Gambling experts agree that the industry is on the cusp of a massive shake-out and that within the next two years only a fraction of the current online gambling firms will exist.
Tellingly, analysts at investment bank Merrill Lynch estimate that this year, for the first time since they began about five years ago, the number of online gambling sites dropped. It is thought that a year ago there were some 1,800 sites.
The trickle of casualties is likely to become a flood once the US grants online gambling licences, which will effectively signal the death of the smaller sites. Those operators that hold the new American licences will be allowed to advertise, thus channelling punters to their sites and away from others.
'Many of the states in the US run a deficit. So who will they want to grant a licence to, the biggest operators, who will pay huge tax revenues, or the small guys?' Payne said.
Those that win official approval will gain legitimacy - crucial if they are to build a relationship with punters. 'You've got to make a leap of faith. You've got to trust the brand. You've got to feel safer than when you're going into a shop,' Payne said.
The industry is divided about exactly when the US will give the green light to online gambling, but most agree it will happen.
'Regulation is far better than prohibition. Let's face it, the US hasn't been particularly successful with prohibition in the past,' said Gavin Chittick, chief financial officer of Sports.com, the pan-European sports portal that counts Tiger Woods as an investor and is to launch its own online casino this week.
Already the big US gaming operators are shuffling for position in anticipation of US licences. MGM recently snapped up an online casino licence on the Isle of Man, and expects to have a site up and running in a few months' time. It can't be long before the most famous name in gambling, Caesars in Las Vegas, wants to develop its online presence.
For their part, the US authorities have played a waiting game, watching how countries such as Britain have dealt with the issue. 'It took years for the authorities to get organised crime out of Las Vegas. It's easy to forget the nervousness that surrounds gambling in what is a very conservative society,' Wilkie said.
Recognition and regulation by the authorities is now the holy grail for the industry's biggest players, which seek to migrate punters from the internet to other forms of new media.
'The internet is just the first step. The majority of betting in the future will be entertainment and sporting-led, through interactive TV or over mobile phones,' Wilkie said.
According to analysts at the research firm Sportbusiness.com, by 2015 more than 80 per cent of the industry's revenue will come from sports betting.
An industry regulated by government goes some way to reassuring punters. 'Where do you want to put your money, the UK or Jamaica, where there are minimal regulations?
'You will get to a point soon where the customers and the investors have a choice about where they are going to go,' Wilkie said.
As such, many firms are now moving back onshore. Frederic Diot, of the analysis firm Datamonitor, says: 'Offshore online firms still represent a majority but as new legislation comes into effect legalising online gambling, like in the UK, we can expect a growing number of those companies to come onshore, looking for greater legitimacy, convenience and better infrastructure.'
Now the race is on to build global, multi-currency, multi-lingual operations that can exploit huge economies of scale. Firms that target just one country stand little chance of survival. No big- name online operator has so far made a profit from its UK operations alone. They make money only if they move into other geographical markets. So Ladbrokes is targeting Asia, while Coral Eurobet moves into Italy.
'You've got to have scale. Three years ago we took $4,500 on the Super Bowl. This year we took bets worth over $10m, and the cost of servicing this was only 12.5 per cent higher,' Payne said.
The rewards for those left in the game are getting bigger. But many can no longer afford to play.
Sunday April 7, 2002
The Observer
It was billed as the new Eldorado, a surefire way of making money from the internet. Online casinos and gambling websites were predicted to earn huge sums for such places as Costa Rica and Bermuda by allowing billions of people hitherto deprived of gambling to bet wherever and whenever they wanted. 'The internet was global and as only 10 countries in the world have legalised bet ting shops, suddenly everyman and his dog thought "I'd like a bit of that",' said Nigel Payne, chief executive of Sportingbet.com which runs the largest online sports book in the world.
Thousands of sites based on sun-drenched islands where the authorities had scant interest in regulatory affairs sprang up seemingly overnight, attracting huge followings in Asia, the United States and the Middle East, where betting was banned.
After pornography, gambling quickly became the biggest online money spinner.
But many investors lured by the prospect of fantastic rewards, have played a high stakes game and lost in spectacular fashion. The promise of easy money has evaporated. 'It's very easy to set up an online casino, but it's increasingly difficult to make money out of it,' said Iain Wilkie, hospitality and leisure partner at consultant Ernst & Young.
Even established names have had their fingers burnt. The owner of Harrods, Mohamed al-Fayed, set up an online casino, Harrods.com. But the value of shares in Gaming Insight, the company that powers the site and in which Harrods Online holds a stake, has fallen from 25p last June to around 6p now, despite the company announcing that profits were up by 300 per cent to more than £12 million in the 18 months to 31 December last year.
Last week it was the turn of Damian Aspinall, son of the zookeeper and casinos magnate John Aspinall, to experience a reality check. His internet firm, the AIM-listed Aspinalls Online, admitted that a Bermuda-based online casino business it bought for more than £30m less than a year ago, was worthless.
In addition, the firm is to subcontract the management of its two online casinos to an outside operator. It all adds up to an ignominious fall from grace for one of the most famous names in casinos.
But these are grim times for most of the estimated 1,400 online gambling sites. Although the industry, which produced revenues of $4.6 billion last year, is predicted to be worth more than $125bn by 2015, it is undergoing massive turbulence.
'We're now seeing an industry fallout as the stronger players with the brands assert themselves. The smaller, opportunistic guys in places like Antigua or Costa Rica may have done well at first but most will be history,' Wilkie said.
Many have already had little choice but to close for good. US credit card firms and banks, worried about the rising levels of fraud, have taken to blocking transactions with the offshore firms, effectively cutting off their business.
Gambling experts agree that the industry is on the cusp of a massive shake-out and that within the next two years only a fraction of the current online gambling firms will exist.
Tellingly, analysts at investment bank Merrill Lynch estimate that this year, for the first time since they began about five years ago, the number of online gambling sites dropped. It is thought that a year ago there were some 1,800 sites.
The trickle of casualties is likely to become a flood once the US grants online gambling licences, which will effectively signal the death of the smaller sites. Those operators that hold the new American licences will be allowed to advertise, thus channelling punters to their sites and away from others.
'Many of the states in the US run a deficit. So who will they want to grant a licence to, the biggest operators, who will pay huge tax revenues, or the small guys?' Payne said.
Those that win official approval will gain legitimacy - crucial if they are to build a relationship with punters. 'You've got to make a leap of faith. You've got to trust the brand. You've got to feel safer than when you're going into a shop,' Payne said.
The industry is divided about exactly when the US will give the green light to online gambling, but most agree it will happen.
'Regulation is far better than prohibition. Let's face it, the US hasn't been particularly successful with prohibition in the past,' said Gavin Chittick, chief financial officer of Sports.com, the pan-European sports portal that counts Tiger Woods as an investor and is to launch its own online casino this week.
Already the big US gaming operators are shuffling for position in anticipation of US licences. MGM recently snapped up an online casino licence on the Isle of Man, and expects to have a site up and running in a few months' time. It can't be long before the most famous name in gambling, Caesars in Las Vegas, wants to develop its online presence.
For their part, the US authorities have played a waiting game, watching how countries such as Britain have dealt with the issue. 'It took years for the authorities to get organised crime out of Las Vegas. It's easy to forget the nervousness that surrounds gambling in what is a very conservative society,' Wilkie said.
Recognition and regulation by the authorities is now the holy grail for the industry's biggest players, which seek to migrate punters from the internet to other forms of new media.
'The internet is just the first step. The majority of betting in the future will be entertainment and sporting-led, through interactive TV or over mobile phones,' Wilkie said.
According to analysts at the research firm Sportbusiness.com, by 2015 more than 80 per cent of the industry's revenue will come from sports betting.
An industry regulated by government goes some way to reassuring punters. 'Where do you want to put your money, the UK or Jamaica, where there are minimal regulations?
'You will get to a point soon where the customers and the investors have a choice about where they are going to go,' Wilkie said.
As such, many firms are now moving back onshore. Frederic Diot, of the analysis firm Datamonitor, says: 'Offshore online firms still represent a majority but as new legislation comes into effect legalising online gambling, like in the UK, we can expect a growing number of those companies to come onshore, looking for greater legitimacy, convenience and better infrastructure.'
Now the race is on to build global, multi-currency, multi-lingual operations that can exploit huge economies of scale. Firms that target just one country stand little chance of survival. No big- name online operator has so far made a profit from its UK operations alone. They make money only if they move into other geographical markets. So Ladbrokes is targeting Asia, while Coral Eurobet moves into Italy.
'You've got to have scale. Three years ago we took $4,500 on the Super Bowl. This year we took bets worth over $10m, and the cost of servicing this was only 12.5 per cent higher,' Payne said.
The rewards for those left in the game are getting bigger. But many can no longer afford to play.