Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Any comments on S.O.S. ? service ? pay?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Any comments on S.O.S. ? service ? pay?

    thanks!

  • #2
    Service - A+
    Pay - A+

    Any comments = ONE OF THE BEST

    Comment


    • #3
      that's one solid endorsement. if anybody seconds that one i will go ahead and give them my cash.thanks underdog

      Comment


      • #4
        Can't go wrong with SOS. They have been a class act for many years.

        Comment


        • #5
          I have to agree with the high marks given SOS - a great bunch there.

          I'm not crazy about having to download software to wager by 'net, but other than that they're tops.

          Comment


          • #6
            My only problem in downloading software is everytime I'm at work. It's a little bit inconvenient but it's worth getting a different line SOS is still using Jim Feist, their lines lean heavy towards favored teams. If you are an underdog bettor, SOS is a must.

            Comment


            • #7
              thanks guys. looks like they are a well respected and reliable place.

              Comment


              • #8
                Are there any plans for browser based software? The downloadable software for every book I have tried sux.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Their downloadable software is the same that WWTS and Premiere League used to use way back when. I actually prefer it to the browser based systems those places now use. I couldn't speak for recent developments but I was down there about 10 months ago and they seemed to indicate they were really pleased with the information that their software package provided. Once you have it up, its a very quick system to use. Only thing I don't like is it times out after a few minutes. As far as phone service, they are easily the fastest I've used. If I need to get a bet in quick I always call there.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I agree about the software. I prefer the browser based also. I wonder what keeps them from using a browser based system?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X