One of the reasons that I am a Bettorsworld fan is their track record when it comes to recommending sportsbooks. Unlike the two other sites, Bettorsworld never recommended Abetz. To my mind, it is quite unsettling that the other two sites ever gave Abetz their seal of approval or entered into any promotional agreement with them.
Simply put, the other two sites are not doing their job. If they were, they never would have been Abetz supporters.I had considered playing with Abetz at the beginning of baseball because I had heard that they had soft numbers. But a few calls to some offshore BMs who know what's going on convinced me that Abetz was a problem waiting to happen. Naturally, this begs the question: Don't the other two sites have reliable contacts in the industry who can give them the lowdown on other sportsbooks?
I mean, my job is not to check-out sportsbooks, and, yet, from the get-go, I was well aware that Abetz was a potentially problematic out. Why weren't the other two sites aware of this fact?
Simply put, the other two sites are not doing their job. If they were, they never would have been Abetz supporters.I had considered playing with Abetz at the beginning of baseball because I had heard that they had soft numbers. But a few calls to some offshore BMs who know what's going on convinced me that Abetz was a problem waiting to happen. Naturally, this begs the question: Don't the other two sites have reliable contacts in the industry who can give them the lowdown on other sportsbooks?
I mean, my job is not to check-out sportsbooks, and, yet, from the get-go, I was well aware that Abetz was a potentially problematic out. Why weren't the other two sites aware of this fact?
Comment