Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

did I overreact?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • did I overreact?

    Curious for feedback about this latest set of experiences at a book. For now, at least, the book will remain nameless to not prejudice opinions. Warning: this is a long post....

    Incident 1: Two weeks ago, I asked for a withdrawl, one of several in a row over multiple weeks. I had originally deposited funds via credit card, so Ic alled and asked if I had paid off the credit cards in my prior withdrawls. I was told that I had, so all money coming back would be a check or bank wire. After 7 days of no money, I called, only find out that a card I had used long ago had the money put back onto it. I was upset because I had specifically asked about this, and was told the opposite of what this book did, plus nobody ever told me--I had to call. I lived with the decision because it is policy, although I was peeved how the process was handled and I was expecting cash and made spending plans based on receiving that money.

    Incident 2: The very next week, I made another withdrawl request, and by wednesday realized they hadn't deducted the money from my account. When I called to inquire about this, I was told my request was rejected because it was submitted at 1:12 when the cutoff was 1:00 p.m. eastern time on monday. I was livid because (1) I made this request over the phone and if I was making it late, I should have been told it would not be honored right then, and (2) nobody notified me that it was cancelled afterwards, and (3) I claim that I made it well before 1:00, and asked them to check the phone log to verify this, but nobody would do this. The book manager was not there on this day, and nobody would do anything about it, but the next day the manager had the funds sent.

    Incident 3: this past weekend, I had a play on the 2nd game of a Pitt double-header, and because the first game took so long, hardly anyone had the lines up on their webpage, even though the 2nd game hadn't begun. So, I called a couple joints, and this one had the best line on the total. The guy telling me the line quoted the sides as reversed (pit as the fav when cinci was), so I asked him to repeat the lines. He said the total was 9.5 over -115. I asked, so the under is -105? He said yes. I think I asked twice because he seemed confused. When he again verified the line was 9.5 under -105, asked for a dime. However, I alwys bet a dime to win less when there is juice, so I asked him for a dime to win X. This seemed to throw him, and after several more minutes had passed, he came back and said the game was off the board, but they would let me have a nickle at the line I was quoted. I said I was unhappy about this because the game hadn't started, but agreed to take the nickle and call back to complain about the whole thing later. Well, he proceeded to quote me "500 to win 400", did I want it? What? No, I said, that's not right, do the math again. He came back with 500 to win 434ish. Again, I said, that's not -105; what the heck are you doing?

    After another half-minute of stumbling around, I asked to speak with the linesman to get this bet completed so I could move on. The linesman told me the "line had changed". I explained I was quoted -105 alomst ten minutes ago, and I wanted that line. He scolded me about the actual length of time ("first mistake; you were not on the line for ten minutes"), and told me to take the line he was offering or not. I told him I wanted the quoted line, or I would leave the book. He refused, so I left a message for the customer service manager saying I wa leaving. My main complaint is that if the game was off the board, why could I have a nickle? And I was quoted a line and expected them to honor it even if "the line changed" because I asked for it immediately after the quote.

    The next day, I was locked out of my account, something this book has done to me two other times I had a problem with them. I talked with manager and repeated my story for him, strongly encouraging him to review the phone logs to verify my claims. To my knowledge, he has not done so, even though I asked him repeatedly to do so. I withdrew my money today.

    Is this simply how it is, and I'm overreacting, or is this a strange sounding pattern? Granted, you are left with taking my word for how these transpired. I can only add that in every instance, I appealed to the manager to listen to the phone logs, and I don't think he ever did.

    any thoughts/observations about what I'm missing here?

    thanks,

    Chilly

  • #2
    Chilly, this book really doesn't have its act together. My guess is that they never intended any wrongdoing, but in their stumbling way have made it very aggravating to do business with them.

    I'd only stay if they had lots of money and really goofy lines.

    After you get some opinions, I hope you'll tell us which book it was.

    Comment


    • #3
      Actually, Chilly, your story strikes a very familiar tone. I've had similar problems with a book quoting a line, putting me on hold after I ask for a dime, and coming back with "the line has moved" story. What probably added to the confusion was that at -105, you were asking for a "risk" amount of a dime, which many clerks might have difficulty with on the fly. I always try to keep it as simple as possible when on the phone. If I want an off amount, I'll try to play it online.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think when you repeatedly questioned the line you basically gave the book an impression that they had a bad line so they changed it. The line they qoute you is not the line you get until your bet is punched in the computor. It may change in the few seconds it takes the operator to place your bet. The other stuff you talked about sounds unprofessional and incompetence. I would like you to name the book. Especially if they are on any of the recommended lists. At least tell us that much.

        Comment


        • #5

          Thanks for the thoughts, you night owls.

          I would like to hear other thoughts, and get my money, before naming the book, if I do. I've seen others' payments "get delayed" when they outright name a book, and there isn't anything seriously wrong with the book in question, so I'll wait. A worse case scenario is that my situation was handled very poorly, so I don't feel anyone is in immediate jeopordy here, or I would be more open about it. I just wondered if my experiences were common, and I blew a fuse for a minor reason.

          Keep in mind that this is a one-sided debate, and I don't want to unfairly bash this book that I had no problems with until recently. Maybe its coincidence, but I had never won money in this book before? It seems like the more I win in a book, the more problems that seem to crop up, such as slow payments, and worse service, and getting put on hold when I call for lines. The main exceptions for me are Dunes, Premiere League, and wsex, who always do a great job.

          Chilly

          Comment


          • #6
            Chiily, you were right to do what you did. The book was in the wrong. Wait till you get your dough and let us know who they are.

            Comment


            • #7
              I agree with Sportshobby...

              If this book has some incredible incentives, lines, etc, then I can see why you would be reluctant to leave.

              However, with that being said, I would have no trust with this out after these incidences. There are plenty of trustworthy books out there looking for your business!

              Comment


              • #8
                This fits in exactly with my post on Zippy's thread "are shrewd bettors wanted". Chili, did you get a big bonus for signing up? Cause it sounds like customer service is not the main priority at this book.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Actually---no big bonus, but good lines for dogs in baseball, and independent ones in football. Its a book on the list here. I feel I should stress that for most of the time, I had no problems whatsoever, and I recommended the book to others. I doubt I would go back, however, because nobody from this place ever showed me that I was wrong, by reviewing the tapes or otherwise. If I was wrong, then I will say so, and clear this up. If I was right, I feel I was owed more than I received. Overall, not a bad book, but too many problems in a row to continue when I have other options. Main problem was the payouts, actually; even though I received all of them, it was a fight at the end and it takes too long.

                  Chilly

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hmmmmm I like a good mystery, and if this was clue....

                    My guess would be Bowmans or Intertops...

                    Don't ask for my reasoning....

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      No, Intertops can be eliminated because there's no phone wagering there, I think.

                      On the the next clue . . .

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        of course, as I badmouth the joint, a check arrived this morning, the quickest turnaround I ever experienced with them. The manager told me they were moving to 6 or 7 day payouts in the future (instead of monday only), which might have been enough to bring to back were it not for their linesman.

                        enough clues now?

                        Chilly

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Chili,
                          I have to ask you if you were calm and reserved in your request for the play or did you yell and scream at the linesman to give you the line the clerk quoted you? I think I know where you made this play and the linesman over there is one of the most respected man in this business. If I'm right, this situation could have been a case of a pissing contest that got out of hand

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Chilly,

                            As I saw your first post, I was perfectly content to sit and watch this unfold. I was glad to see that you did keep mentioning the fact that this was a one sided post, until now. Allow me to present our side.

                            Incident #1: You have used multiple forms of deposit, and in the interest of your security I will not mention how those deposits were made. When you inquired about the reimbursement to your credit card, the clerk informed you that you would have a check sent to you. However, you still had a pending balance on another card, so we reimbursed the money to that card. Upon your inquiry, I personally explained this and you seemed satisfied with our resolution.

                            Incident #2: Our rules clearly state that your request must be in by 1 pm EST and, as you stated, our computers show your request came in at 1:12. I was off when you called. On Thursday we spoke, I explained what happened and took care of your situation immediately. When we hung up, you thanked me and seemingly understood why this had occurred. I realize that you said I took care of it in your post, but you spent more time showing what you feel we did wrong, rather than what what we did right, so I thought this should be reitterated.

                            Incident #3: As you well know, I was sitting right next to the clerk and, when you were transferred to Chester, next to him as well. Fact: The clerk gave you the wrong side. Then when you asked for your wager, the screen was refreshed, the line had changed, and the clerk became somewhat confused. When you were transferred to Chester, he was trying to accomodate you, as any good BM would. You gave him an ultimatum, he decided not to take it. You chose to leave us. Again, I was right next to Chester during this conversation. Our phones display the length of time that our clients spend on the phone, and when you were transferred to him, you had been on the phone just over 5 minutes. Granted, this is a long time and when you are experiencing difficulties, it could seem longer. My point is, Chester was willing to accomodate you. You were not willing to be accomodated. You wanted all or nothing.

                            I chose not to listen to the tapes, because I witnessed everything first hand. I still firmly believe that we did everything we could, besides giving you the bad line, which was a difference of about 30 cents. We wanted to accomodate you, Chester tried to talk to you, but you would have none of it. Therefore, I felt it was in yours, and our, best interest to let you leave us if you wanted. I welcome you back, and will always be available to talk.

                            To everyone else, I hope this clears up any misconception or misunderstandings. I am glad to hear that Chilly got his check in a rapid manner. For those of you who implied that we might hold up his funds if he mentioned our name, this is very untrue. The money in our clients accounts is not our money. It is theirs. If they want it, they get it. As Chilly mentioned, 7 day a week payouts are coming soon, hopefully within a week, so we will be able to deliver on an even more rapid basis.

                            I am sorry this post was so long, but I felt the need to respond. I always appreciate feedback, positive and negative. It is what helps us grow and become a better company. Thank you for your time, one and all.

                            Jake Slater
                            General Manager
                            Sportbet.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              According to Chilly’s version, he did everything he was supposed to do to place a $1000 bet well before the line changed. The apparent reason the play didn’t make it in before the line change was the clerk’s confusion about who was favored, what the line was, how to calculate the potential win from the amount risked, etc. I’d have given him his play, rather than penalize a player for a clerk’s incompetence.

                              On the other hand, according to Chilly’s original post, this is the third time he’s been locked out of his account due to various disputes. So maybe there’s a little history here that we don’t know about that explains why Sportbet is not exactly bending over backwards to interpret things in the customer’s favor.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X