This came up on Bookies Hell.
The essence of the question is: who do oddsmakers have in mind when they post a line? Is it the general public or the syndicates and wise guys?
Take this year's baseball season. All underdogs have made money consistently through the season. I attribute that to the fact that there are millions and millions of new bettors online.
But Ronbets, a very knowledgeable poster, says the theory is wrong. He asks how many squares it would take to make up for one syndicate. Good point. I don't know.
Does anyone have factual information about this? Before you dismiss the general public, remember that there are millions of people now betting online.
Not only do I find this very intersting, but I'd also like to know if I should dismiss the underdog theory for the NFL season.
The essence of the question is: who do oddsmakers have in mind when they post a line? Is it the general public or the syndicates and wise guys?
Take this year's baseball season. All underdogs have made money consistently through the season. I attribute that to the fact that there are millions and millions of new bettors online.
But Ronbets, a very knowledgeable poster, says the theory is wrong. He asks how many squares it would take to make up for one syndicate. Good point. I don't know.
Does anyone have factual information about this? Before you dismiss the general public, remember that there are millions of people now betting online.
Not only do I find this very intersting, but I'd also like to know if I should dismiss the underdog theory for the NFL season.
Comment