Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Salerno agrees to sell Megasports

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Salerno agrees to sell Megasports

    Las Vegas Firm Tells Regulators It Will Sell Subsidiary That Takes Internet Bets

    by Our Partners at the Las Vegas Sun


    by Cy Ryan

    CARSON CITY, NEVADA -- In the first disciplinary case ever in Nevada for Internet gambling violations, a Las Vegas company agreed to pay a $10,000 fine and to sell off its Australian business that allegedly accepted illegal sports bets.

    American Wagering Inc. and the state Gaming Control Board Wednesday signed a stipulation to settle the complaint that was filed against the company last December.

    Deputy Attorney General Derek Harmer said the case took extended time to settle because this was the first one in Nevada. State regulations prohibit betting by fax, telephone or the Internet.

    American Wagering, whose president is Victor Salerno, must pay the fine to the Nevada Gaming Commission when it meets later this month. The company also agreed to sell off Megasports Australia in 180 days. And during this interim period, American Wagering must keep close tabs on Megasports to make sure there are no other illegal bets made from the United States.

    Megasports is licensed in Australia to accept Internet bets.
    Victor Salerno, chief executive
    of American Wagering

    The Control Board has been taking a closer look at Nevada gaming companies that may have ties to the Internet gambling industry. Regulators are worried that the state's reputation may suffer if federal action is taken against an illegal betting operation that has ties to a Nevada company.

    The complaint against AWI said a Control Board agent in Las Vegas, using the bogus name of James Lawrence, used the Internet to open a $100 wagering account with Megasports. The money was deducted from the credit card account of Lawrence. Between July 23 and Aug. 4, 1999, Lawrence placed 12 bets on major league baseball teams. In the end, he had $114.

    Lawrence tried to cash out and an employee of Megasports told him that money could be sent anywhere in the world. The employee also allegedly said that bets could not be made from within the United States.

    A day later, Megasports locked up the Lawrence account. And Salerno sent a letter to Lawrence saying Megasports rescinded all wagers placed through the Internet and asked how he wanted his original $100 returned.

    AWI did not admit nor deny the allegations in the complaint but agreed to settle the case without contesting the allegations. The board said there was no evidence the violations were the result of "any willful act or omission by AWI or its directors, officers or employees."

    AWI will have 180 days to divest itself of the Australian subsidiary from the date of paying the fine. If it needs additional time to sell, it must get permission from the board or commission.

    If AWI doesn't make the deadline and doesn't get an extension, the Australian company must stop taking wagers and freeze all accounts within 24 hours pending a hearing before the gaming commission.

    The commission will have the option to shut down all operations of Megasports within 72 hours if it determines AWI has failed to act in good faith in trying to sell the subsidiary. The commission could also require Megasports to pay back all money owed on its wagering accounts within 30 days. AWI could also face further disciplinary action in Nevada.

    The board, in the stipulation, said AWI "has taken aggressive and prompt remedial measures to prevent" future violations of the regulations.

    But between now and the sale of the subsidiary, AWI must submit bi-monthly reports "related to the initial blocked Internet access to the Megasports Australia site."

    There must be periodic audits to make sure the employees of the Australia company are complying with the conditions. AWI must notify the board of any active Megasports account that originated in the United States. Those account must be closed and the wagers rescinded. AWI must continue to work with Internet consultants to develop better technology to target Internet access origins.

    AWI said this settlement "is not the product of force, threats nor is influenced by any form of duress or coercion ..."

    - July 13, 2000
    TOP

    Rich Rosenthal

  • #2
    I wonder if the new owners will take American bets?
    Rich Rosenthal

    Comment


    • #3
      Big Brother strikes again. I swear we get closer to George Orwell and 1984 every bloody day. God, government run amok disgusts me. Why don't they spend their time on items of actual importance (EDUCATION/HEALTH CARE/THE DEBT) instead of trying to bust law abiding citizens participating in recreational activities.

      And another thing, drinking is a vice just like gambling. If gambling is so illegal, why is drinking so legal. The sheer hypocrisy of the government's (and the Nevada casino lobby's for that matter) actions related to internet gambling is repugnant.

      And to answer my own question I'll tell you why. Cause of all the tax dollars the government sucks up in booze taxes, wheras it is getting none of that from internet betting. As well as all the perks and kickbacks and CASH! the politicians recieve from the Christian Coalition (don't get me started on these guys) and the brick and mortar casinos who see the internet as a threat. Well if the damned politicians would wake up and smell the greenbacks (so to speak) they'd realize that the instant they licence internet wagering in the states, it's goodbye worries. They'd be swimming in so much revunue that the taxes on I-wagering would generate that they wouldn't have to worry about things like social security under funding (not that apparently they are too worried about them right now.)

      But instead we have grandstanding egomaniac, future presidential hopefuls like Kyl and Mclean going after law abiding citizens for participating in an activity that basically all other democracies on the planet (England, lots of Europe, Australia, hell rumour has it even China soon) have found to be a simple recreational passtime. Sure there are problem gamblers. There are also problem smokers, problem drinkers etc... and yet these two activities are still legal (and TAXED)


      And I'll tell you something. A whole hell of alot more marriages and families have been (AND WILL BE) wrecked by alcohol than by gambling.

      And for that matter, the government already allows and taxes practically every other form of gambling from land based casinos to lotteries, if they're so worried about protecting the masses, why don't they explain to people what a truly horrible bet lotteries and their 50% takeouts are.

      And by the way, just how exactly is internet gambling different from day trading. I'll tell you how. NOT AT ALL. You've got investors (BETTORS) continuously watching their NASDAQ level 2 screens (DON BEST) waiting for good buying (scalping/middling) opportunities. As well you've got stock brokers and account advisors (agents and touts) pressuring you into buying their hot stock (pick of the day). So if i-gambling is so wrong, why the hell is day trading so legal and moral?

      the stench from this type of putrid and fetid government hypocrisy makes me want to puke

      Comment


      • #4
        Greedo, well put. Could not have said it half as well, but I think we all agree with you
        110%, I know I do.

        Comment


        • #5
          I hope whoever buys it out decides to do something with it. Primitive site loads fast, but has very bare-bones wagering options (no teasers, parlays, buying hooks), and has covered fewer sports this year than last. Soccer has been going downhill and the vig has gone up on all N. American sports.

          Customer service is top-drawer so they have that as a strong starting point but if they're not laying -108 for football this year I may look elsewhere. I had my account frozen there last Sept. as you may recall until I could prove I was not American and as it is I'm a little disappointed I stuck it out.

          Comment


          • #6
            Good point Shawn, was going to write to them about the soccer thing - no I guess I know why, no point doing work if you are offloading, I guess.

            Still got good value lines and Nascar though.

            Had the best price for me for Tromso in Norwegian Eliteserien and Essendon, so not all bad.

            Comment


            • #7
              Haven't done baseball for a week or two, but looking at the lines, still looks like it is about1.96 on an even game, so still good value.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yeah I remember when bases were 1.97 one side 1.98 the other on an even game. Now THAT was too good to last but was fun while it lasted. Whole month of August last year with my various outs and shopping I had nothing worse than 5 cents negative vig on every game I played...usually 6-8 cents.

                I don't know. Sitting here with a 28.8 modem at first I must admit I worshipped the barebones nature of the site.

                Comment


                • #9
                  yeah, must say that a good 56K modem about 3 years ago was one of the best uses for 200 bucks ever

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Main reasons for them dropping a lot of non-US sports were

                    A - they were getting caned
                    B - head of the sports dept, Michael Tomeny, went next door to Canbet.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well, I knew B, some little birds tell you A?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X