Tweet
When the books had their winter meeting on the wide line I suggested they also put on the agenda a discussion of standardizing bonus procedures. I still think this is a good idea. Turning a deposit amount over three times for a match bonus seems reasonable to me. What doesn't seem reasonable is changing this policy every few months or adjusting it because an account looks suspicious.
Like Ayce in another post I too wrote about some small players who, while I thought the books's policy fair, thought it was unfair because it (the turnover policy) wasn't explained to them up-front. They weren't bonus hoppers either, just guys who bet a few football games and wanted their money at the end of the season.
I'm sympathetic with the books on the need to protect themselves against extreme bonus-mongering hedgers, but I don't think you guys realize how much you're hurting yourself with Joe Sixpack by flashing bonuses that turn out to have (what seem to them) strings attached.
Like Ayce in another post I too wrote about some small players who, while I thought the books's policy fair, thought it was unfair because it (the turnover policy) wasn't explained to them up-front. They weren't bonus hoppers either, just guys who bet a few football games and wanted their money at the end of the season.
I'm sympathetic with the books on the need to protect themselves against extreme bonus-mongering hedgers, but I don't think you guys realize how much you're hurting yourself with Joe Sixpack by flashing bonuses that turn out to have (what seem to them) strings attached.
Comment