I thought the USA vs. Truesdale case set precedent that agents weren't in violation of 1084 if they represent a licensed, foreign company.
Gambling is illegal in Japan. Wouldn't indicting an agent be the same thing as the Japanese Gov't indicting Steve Wynn for allowing Japanese citizens to gamble at the Mirage?
Isn't USA vs. Truesdale the main reason why legal scholars think Jay is going to win on appeal?
Gambling is illegal in Japan. Wouldn't indicting an agent be the same thing as the Japanese Gov't indicting Steve Wynn for allowing Japanese citizens to gamble at the Mirage?
Isn't USA vs. Truesdale the main reason why legal scholars think Jay is going to win on appeal?
Comment