Diaz, it's your call. Yes, you are the one responsible for the debt, and that part of the equation will never go away. And as Paulie said, if you don't pay them back, you might do the same thing again.
But I think books should also look at how they conduct business. By letting people bet through deposits only, they are doing all they can to make sure that people bet with money they can afford to lose.
But books that take bets using credit cards (practically all books), have no qualms about doing so. They are letting people bet with money they often can't afford to lose. Sure, the player is responsible for his/her own actions, but I have little or no sympathy for a book that can't claim the funds if they were deposited by credit card.
I understand that books can't afford to simply stop accepting payment by plastic. Maybe if they all stopped at once... but that's an unfeasible idea that will never happen.
Nonetheless, like I said, the book bears part of the risk for accepting plastic and sometimes that risk means that they will not get their funds.
But I think books should also look at how they conduct business. By letting people bet through deposits only, they are doing all they can to make sure that people bet with money they can afford to lose.
But books that take bets using credit cards (practically all books), have no qualms about doing so. They are letting people bet with money they often can't afford to lose. Sure, the player is responsible for his/her own actions, but I have little or no sympathy for a book that can't claim the funds if they were deposited by credit card.
I understand that books can't afford to simply stop accepting payment by plastic. Maybe if they all stopped at once... but that's an unfeasible idea that will never happen.
Nonetheless, like I said, the book bears part of the risk for accepting plastic and sometimes that risk means that they will not get their funds.
Comment