Dear Mr. Reno,
No disrespect intended but I knew exactly what you were doing in regards to dog end scalps in baseball. In a previous post by yourself you attested to that fact.
If as you contend I was merely following the don best screen how was it that you were able to scalp the number?
I was giving you $3000 a game, other players in the house I was giving up to $20,000 at the same number you got and they were doing the exact same thing you were doing.
What was the difference?
They were playing me all there own personal plays not just waiting to catch me on the end of dog scalps.
I posted those kind of numbers so that my day to day players could go out and earn.
I can assure you when I was letting you take +65 on a baseball game I could easily have gone out and laid -63 and with commission to boot.
I am not saying you did anything wrong but when I stretch a number I hope my day to day players can earn with it because I know their money will stay in the house.
As a professional, I just can't allow somebody to take +65 when I can go lay -63 and then have them take my money to go pay another book.
When KY played on the Thursday night game awhile back this year I was dealing the game 7 when the Don Best screen was painted 6.5 and 6.
It is grossly unfair for anybody to characterize any book as a copy cat book without actually seeing how their work is bet.
As I told you when I spoke to you I meant you no disrespect and I appreciated your position having been told I was persona non grata in probably more places than yourself.
This is merely a statement of our position in regards to this matter and not the first shot in a war between betmaker.com and Reno.
Bookmaking Director
betmaker.com
No disrespect intended but I knew exactly what you were doing in regards to dog end scalps in baseball. In a previous post by yourself you attested to that fact.
If as you contend I was merely following the don best screen how was it that you were able to scalp the number?
I was giving you $3000 a game, other players in the house I was giving up to $20,000 at the same number you got and they were doing the exact same thing you were doing.
What was the difference?
They were playing me all there own personal plays not just waiting to catch me on the end of dog scalps.
I posted those kind of numbers so that my day to day players could go out and earn.
I can assure you when I was letting you take +65 on a baseball game I could easily have gone out and laid -63 and with commission to boot.
I am not saying you did anything wrong but when I stretch a number I hope my day to day players can earn with it because I know their money will stay in the house.
As a professional, I just can't allow somebody to take +65 when I can go lay -63 and then have them take my money to go pay another book.
When KY played on the Thursday night game awhile back this year I was dealing the game 7 when the Don Best screen was painted 6.5 and 6.
It is grossly unfair for anybody to characterize any book as a copy cat book without actually seeing how their work is bet.
As I told you when I spoke to you I meant you no disrespect and I appreciated your position having been told I was persona non grata in probably more places than yourself.
This is merely a statement of our position in regards to this matter and not the first shot in a war between betmaker.com and Reno.
Bookmaking Director
betmaker.com
Comment